1984
by George Orwell is entertaining and excellently written both in terms of political
ideas and plot construction. It does have a few flaws, however. The ending is
unsatisfactory and makes quite a tragedy (as far as democratic Americans are
concerned). Questions are left unanswered. How could Winston become
brainwashed? He so desperately wanted truth to stand. His failure can be
attributed to a lack of confidence in his own ability to reason so that his
whole intellect broke down in the face of pain, becoming a wasteland just like
most of the minds in Oceania. This makes me wonder whether or not I could
withstand. I want to say that I could, but under such trauma it is difficult to
say. Although Orwell could be using the book make democratic countries thankful
for their situation, he is most likely warning us about where our society could
end up. To that end, he makes a convincing but dubious argument. The tyrannical
control of people’s entire lives and most devastatingly, the complete control
of truth appeals primarily to ethos and pathos because his society is illogical.
In practice, people do not enjoy power as much as wealth and glory. Power is a
means to an end. Rulers throughout the ages have craved power so that they
could be respected, worshiped, and paid by their subjects. They would never
limit themselves just to get the power. Orwell’s society may seem impregnable,
but it could not arise without falling apart due to the greed of men. It is
difficult enough for people to share things in a society with ownership, could
the members of the Inner Party really strip themselves of all of their wealth
and leave no trace of themselves when they die? Orwell’s society would have
collapsed before it began. Before the society could become completely
oppressive, people would have objected severely to the destruction of truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment